RIO DE JANEIRO, July 9, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Bruno Fernandes de Souza, goalkeeper, captain and idol of fans of Rio de Janeiro’s Flamengo soccer club, has been arrested for suspicion of arranging the murder of his one-time mistress Eliza Samudio. Samudio, who was described by the newspaper O Globo as “a student, model and pornographic film actress,” was seeking to prove that de Souza was the father of her now 4-month-old son who she called Bruninho (Little Bruno). Samudio had been seeking a court order for DNA testing to prove de Souza’s paternity of the child, telling the media that after she told the footballer she was pregnant by him, he tried to force her to take drugs to cause a miscarriage and later tried to take her by force to an abortionist. She went to the police instead. In a glimpse into the often sordid world of pro soccer, de Souza, though admitting he had sex with Samudio at a party with other players of the club in May of last year, refused to acknowledge that he may have fathered the child. “It was an orgy. These parties are common in our circle. I was with her, everyone was with her,” he told Veja magazine before his arrest. The focus of the investigation turned toward de Souza when his 17-year-old cousin told police he heard Bruno tell two friends to “resolve the problem” after they had lured Samudio to his country retreat outside Belo Horizonte. In his statement he told police that he witnessed the woman being tied up and strangled, and then her remains fed to four Rottweilers. According to a report by The Guardian, police believe de Souza lured Samudio to the small town outside of Rio de Janeiro where she was beaten, killed by an accomplice, and had some of her body parts fed to dogs, while the rest was buried under concrete. “Bruno was there and he saw how the woman was completely broken,” Edson Moreira, the homicide investigator in charge of the case, told reporters, adding that the soccer player was a “monster for what he did to this young lady.” Police have also arrested de Souza’s wife, Dayana Rodrigues, who was found to have arranged for the care of the missing woman’s baby in a friend’s home. For his part de Souza denies any involvement in Samudio’s disappearance, and through his lawyer, Michel Assef Filho, told reporters that he is “horrified” by the claims made in his cousin’s statement. Commenting on the Samudio case, and why so many soccer players are involved in scandals, psychoanalyst Socrates Nolasco dans Istoe told the Brazilian press that those who gain fame and money through sports are sometimes ill-equipped to understand the moral consequences of their behavior. “Quickly gaining glory and wealth, they think they can do everything, they are above the law,” dans Istoe said.
I fail to see the problem here.
Abortion teaches a culture that the supreme value in life is “sexual freedom” even if you have to kill to get it or hold on to it, as the case may be. No one really buys the bullkaka that a fetus is not a baby. Deep down, even the most radical and obnoxious feminist understands this. The honest ones admit it. And so, despite the propaganda that is often vomited in the media by pro-abortionists, everyone knows the language of abortion very well.
The language of abortion is not merely spoken against unborn children. It seeks to speak to a much larger audience and teach them its murderous ways too. You see, those who speak the language of abortion do not accept these quaint and artificial boundaries of the womb which society has artificially imposed. Let’s not quibble about the details of whether the person is inside the womb or outside of it. People are not dissuaded from committing crimes by legal fictions. They are dissuaded from real moral arguments. That’s why violent boyfriends and even casual sex partners see no problem in killing women to protect their own “sexual and reproductive rights”. They have learned from feminists that it’s perfectly acceptable to kill to protect one’s “liberty“. So, from their perspective, what’s good for the goose, is good for the gander. They have understood clearly that if the overriding goal is to protect one’s sexual liberty by permitting killing humans, then that teaching must be applied universally, regardless of age or location. The important thing, therefore, is to ensure that such “choices” are protected.
Freedom of choice to kill for all or for none.
That’s why, they say, proposed legislation like Roxanne’s law must be opposed. It’s discrimatory and not fair to the sexual predator murderers!