U of Zero Abortion Debate with Stephanie Gray, Pro-Aborts Admit: “Of Course She Won”

 

Here.

From Run With Life

A “pro-choice” commenter to my blog said that: “this debate was a total set-up. no one from the pro-choice community in ottawa was asked to participate in the debate. while it was nice that jovan accepted the non-invitation, he did not have the background or experience to argue from the perspective of the pro-choice movement and ended up making some pretty oppressive and ineffectivley thought-out arguments. stephanie spends her entire career articulating these issues, of course she “won“. but the pro-life side certainly didn’t gain any credibility for such a poorly run event.”

So I checked it out, to see exactly who was invited to debate Stephanie Gray. Here is the list of people who either declined, or did not reply, or ignored the organizers’ invitations.

i. Dr. Henry Morgentaler (declined to debate) ii. Heather Mallick (“pro-choice” columnist for the Toronto Star) (no reply to invitation) iii. Hon. Dr. Hedy Fry (MP) (declined to debate) iv. Hon. Dr. Carolyn Bennett (MP) (declined to debate) v. Dr. Kathryn Treehuba, Uof Ottawa professor (Obs-Gyn), and Ottawa-area abortion provider (no reply to invitation) vi. Dr. Fraser Fellows, UWO professor (Obs-Gyn), and London-area abortion provider (no reply to invitation) vii. Federation of Medical Women of Canada (declined to debate) viii. Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada- Joyce Arthur (declined to debate) ix. NDP Party (no reply to invitation) x. Canadians for Choice (declined to debate) xi. Action Canada for Population Development (no reply to invitation) xii. Hon. Dr. Keith Martin (MP) (No reply to invitation) xiii. Planned Parenthood Ottawa (Heather Holland – Executive Director- Declined to debate) xiv. Canadian Federation for Sexual Health (no reply to invitation) xv. Professor Sanda Rodgers (University of Ottawa) (declined to debate) xvi. Professor Wayne Sumner (University of Toronto) (declined to debate)

If the “pro-choicers” were not happy with Jovan Morales representing their position, they have only themselves to blame. They were given plenty of opportunity to participate, and declined to. I guess they thought they could shut down the debate this way. Well, how well did that work out for them? Not too good I’d say. (Source)

This is great. Somebody should explain to the pro-abort darlings out there that you don’t get a star for being a no-show at the podium. If you can’t defend your position or, worse, won’t defend it, then guess what? You lose by default. The prize goes to the contender who shows up for the debate.

“Most Canadians, if they don’t show up for work, they don’t get a promotion…” – Jack Layton

3 thoughts on “U of Zero Abortion Debate with Stephanie Gray, Pro-Aborts Admit: “Of Course She Won”

  1. These debates are windows to the character of Western Education and the new Politically Correct Culture, by government decree and court enforcement. It has changed 180 since the two Great Wars. I have been to many of these debates in the new Politically Correct West, with the most memorable ones with my mentor and good friend Professor Tom Landers. People like him make life fulfilling, because objective reasoning is proven to be far superior to non-sense. The New Western Religion of Politically Correct Relativism, by decree and enforcement, always proves to be non-sense as it tries to make reason out of non-reason.

  2. They are losing and they know it.They act like it doesn’t matter and that the “issue is settled”-that is EXACTLY what the Slavers and the “Thousand Year” Reich thought too.
    Like the latter,they are in for a big unpleasant surprise and my only counsel to them is,”try to stay away from the goaty side at the Last Judgement.”

  3. I had never heard Stephanie speak, so I was indeed blessed and met her after when I went up and thanked both participants.

    As far as the fact Jovan accepted the last minute offer, kudos to him. Of course it was a no-contest. Actually, it never could be. Stephanie’s argument (presenting the one and only Truth) would always make mincemeat out of any deceptive twisted distortion of it in debate or anything. How could it not.?
    he debate is Truth vs. Lies. Truth ALWAYS wins. So…one can color it up to make it seem more intellectual or whatever, (Isn’t that one of the post- modern movements’ , and?or liberals’ sayings :Whatever”. Excuse me for using it ,but in this case the shoe fits quite well, it is still the same lies, just dressed up more fancy.

    Personally, I kind of liked the fact that he was not attempting to intellectualize with pride what CANNOT… in all reality be contested. It is a waste of time, however…Truth reveals its great Light when contrasted with shadows and darkness.

    I believe there is potential in Jo van perhaps changing sides, He was wavering on some topics and I managed to get him to say afterwards that he would at least look up the S.N.M.A. C web-site and Rachel’s’ Vineyard web-site. I wrote them both down on a card and asked if he was open-minded to which he said “Yes”, and to which I asked him, if he would check out these websites.

    You never know …Please God shower him, with your Truth, love, mercy and grace so his eyes are open.

    Thanks for the email and the list and of course the Truth that was left out.

    Frances,
    In Him

    For LifeRed rose

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Solve : *
22 + 5 =