Introduction
Another subjectivist fallacy is what I like to jokingly refer to as the "Guido defense"; that is, sending over Uncle Guido to get your opponent to "see the light". The threat of force - even subtly disguised - is hardly the use of reason, and of course, it need not involve physical force or violence, but any kind of measure which is intended to intimidate or brow beat an opponent into accepting the proposition under discussion.
Definition
The fallacy that purports to argue a proposition on the basis of force or intimidation.
Illustrations
Argument #1: "If you don't accept my view, I'll kick you out of the ministry."
Argument #2: "If you don't want to do abortions, Nurse Chapel, that's fine, but remember that your advancement here at the hospital is tied to your work performance and co-operation with your superiors."
Diagnosis
The person who tries to advance this type of "argument" is using the weight of his authority in order to advance his position. Obviously doing so does not advance the validity of the position. However, it is important to distinguish between a group who uses their authority to correct what they perceive as error, and using that authority as the sole basis for its validity.
Antidote
The best way to counter this kind of argument is to ask your persecutor if he would be willing to be subject to the same treatment if the shoe was on the other foot.
John Pacheco
The Catholic Legate
January 24, 2002