The Gosnell Embargo Cracks – Kirsten Powers Starts To Ask Questions

Infant beheadings. Severed baby feet in jars. A childscreaming after it was delivered alive during an abortion procedure. Haven’t heard about these sickening accusations?

It’s not your fault. Since the murder trial of Pennsylvania abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell began March 18, there has been precious little coverage of the case that should be on every news show and front page. The revolting revelations of Gosnell’s former staff, who have been testifying to what they witnessed and did during late-term abortions, should shock anyone with a heart. (Source)

I understand why liberal reporters don’t want to go here.  We all know why I think.  Because if any outrage is expressed, it might just break through something more fundamental in the abortion debate.  Honey, just what do you think actually happens during an abortion?  Just because Kermit screwed it up for the abortion industry with his uncouth practices doesn’t change the fact that Kermit is not the only killer.

For once, liberals need to start to think critically about why they might oppose Gosnell but support a “woman’s right to choose” generally.  What exactly is the difference?  Baby screams and spinal chord clippings might indeed be unspeakable torture but what about the silent scream you never hear when any baby is aborted?

Time to rethink the group-think.  You don’t want to be in the same camp as Gosnell when history passes its judgement on abortion, do you?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Solve : *
3 + 14 =