What do you mean “violence with violence”? We’re the ones doing “violence”?
Why are you prostituting the language like the pro-aborts do when they invoke the word “violence” – however far from reality it is – to denounce their pro-life opposition? They think doing “violence” to women is “forcing” her “to carry a fetus to term”? Please, don’t prostitute the language to further your argument. It doesn’t work.
To put you straight, Josh, we’re not perpetrating the violence. We are SHOWING THE VIOLENCE so people wake up to the reality of what abortion is. There is a difference. Upsetting sensitivities and causing offence is not true violence. If it were, Jesus Himself would be the most violent man in the history of the world. You need to clue in to this small fact, before you start invoking Him to come to your defense…. rest here.
From a Catholic perspective, the answer to the question of showing graphic images is very clear in my opinion. It’s a resounding YES.
At its heart, the Gospel OFFENDS. Offence cannot be an argument against whether something is moral or licit.