Michael Coren: Evolving Right Out of the Church (Again…Again)

Sad. Very Sad.

Mike, in case you read this post, here are four things you need to ‘git:

1.  Please stop the pornography of victimology that you fraudulently try to trump up, creating a caricature based on the gay fantasy of your opponents.  It’s really becoming a source of fatigue.  You know, as crazy as it sounds, people can actually disagree with you without being hatey-haters.  Shocking but true!

2.  No one claimed you were “intimidated” into buying the Gay line.    You are simply in a difficult situation, having to choose between a close family member or friend and the Truth. You chose the former.  We’ll keep praying for  you, but please understand that your choice has consequences (Matthew 10:37).

3.  You cannot evolve on this “single subject” because this “single subject” – if you are honest – will force you to accept other sins which the Catholic Church categorically rejects.

4.  “Sin” and “disorder” are indeed ugly terms, but that doesn’t mean they should not be used.  The Catechism uses them a lot  – especially in talking about homosexual acts.  Have you heard of the Catechism, Mike? It’s a big book which John Paul II called a “sure norm for teaching the Faith”.  Check it out some time.

By the way, if you must carry on about your new evolution, please be so kind as to distance and disclaim any association with Catholic teaching on the subject.  I trust that you still value integrity.  We expect you to show it.

4 thoughts on “Michael Coren: Evolving Right Out of the Church (Again…Again)

  1. As a Cathoiic Dad, one should be sad, not proud, that one’s adult children support gay marriage.

    Pope Francis, as Cardinal B., called gay marriage diabolical !

  2. What I find suspicious about his writings is that he seems to be coddling up to gays, but he is never direct about what his real thoughts are. He’s just “more loving”. Okay. So, what does that mean, Michael, when you say you won’t use the words “sin” and “disordered”? Does that mean you reject Church teaching on homosexuality? You won’t present Church teaching on homosexuality?

    I have to figure out what he’s thinking. He likes to talk about others and how mean they’ve been to him; and he talks about himself. He doesn’t actually spend a lot of time talking about the issue, per se, which is how do we love gays even if we “accept the teaching of the Church” (if that is indeed his position).

    When you try to make enemies of your fellow, orthodox Catholics, that to me, is a signal that something is wrong.

    Of course, at this point, I don’t really care that much. If I had some kind of pull with him, maybe I would, but this is beyond my power. I just stopped paying attention to him, unless something comes up in my feeds (like this). Otherwise, he doesn’t exist. Don’t really want to read him any more.

  3. I think Gays found Michael’s bleeding heart and worked on it until they got this result. I have been wondering about him for a long time.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *