Marriage, Freedom & The Rainbow Courts

When the whole debate over same-sex “marriage” hit the radar in 2003, I quickly realized that the whole push for it was not really about “equal rights for gays”, and it was certainly not about trying to meet up a pent-up demand (Stats Can says there was 1 gay “marriage” last year in Canada). The whole thing was about establishing legitimacy because once you can establish legitimacy for a cause, it allows the propagandists into a whole range of other social spheres including education and, in particular, into the classrooms to instruct our children on the evils of homophobia.

Another thing it does is it gives more ostensible credibility and impetus in silencing those Canadians (most notably Christians) who still disagree with the lifestyle. That silencing has come through the rainbow courts of this country known as the Human Rights Commissions. We’ve seen it with Scott Brockie, Hugh Owen, Stephen Boisson, Ron Gray, and Catholic Insight Magazine to cite only a few examples.

In 2005, at the March for Marriage & Freedom, my speech reminded everyone that marriage and freedom are inextricably tied together because they draw their source from the natural law and objective moral order – both given to us by Our Creator and not the State. So when the State “re-defined” marriage, it would not be long before it sought to re-define what freedom was to. And that is exactly what has happened with the rise of the sexual police of the human rights commissions. The State and its organs, having divorced themselves from the inherent truth about our nature and likeness as men and women, has gone the next step and re-defined what it means to be free by deciding who can speak and punishing those who should not.

When they told us that a mother was unnecessary for the raising of children, or conversely, that a father was likewise only an option, they showed us all that they preferred an arbitrary standard of “family”. That same arbitrary standard is now being used to push their human rights fraud by restricting those who would dare question or criticize the sexual and religious dogmas they seek to impose on Canadian citizens. I’ve clipped a little bit of the speech here in this video and reproduced the text version below.

My dear friends, we are here today to affirm the goodness of marriage. We are here to affirm and recognize the inherent dignity of the human body and the complimentary nature of men and women in marriage. We are here to admit the necessity of respecting our own basic humanity. We are not here because of hate – we are here because of love. Love for our country. Love for our children. Love for our faith. Love for our family. Love for freedom. And yes, even love for our opponents. But love does not say “yes” when the truth says “no”.

My fellow Canadians, marriage and freedom are built on the same foundation of truth. If, as a nation, we deny the very union which sustains our country, what hope will we have in defending our country against attacks on civil and religious liberties? If we will not defend marriage, then we will not preserve freedom. If our government can redefine something so basic and timeless as marriage, they can also re-define our freedoms.

If Bill C-38 becomes law, the fundamental cornerstone of our society will have been toppled. And when a nation fails to recognize the most basic objective moral and physiological truths, democracy itself will be emptied of its power so that only an empty shell will remain. And when a strong wind blows, I ask you, what will happen to that empty shell?

My fellow Canadians, at this critical moment in our history when our country is on the brink of moral collapse, all of us are faced with the central question: Shall we defend marriage or shall we retreat? If we retreat to buy a little time, what will become of our freedoms when our opponents seek to dictate what is taught in our schools, our churches, and even our homes? And what will be left for our children and their posterity? What will become of their freedoms? Of their divine right to practice their faith and enjoy their civil liberties? Will we lie to ourselves today and say it won’t impact us because we fear the sacrifices that come with it? Ladies and gentlemen, this day is not just about Bill C-38 but about us. We need to look inward, and ask ourselves: How much are we prepared to sacrifice for our country? How prepared are we to recommit ourselves to our marriages, to our children, to our churches, and to our communities? The sacrifices to defend our freedoms are not only fought on the battlefields of far off lands, but also within our hearts and resolve.

When Monday morning comes and all of the excitement of this day is gone, will you remain steadfast and move today’s conviction into tomorrow’s action? If we leave here today, and fail to transform this culture – politically, socially, and spiritually – this day will have meant very little. But I sincerely believe that this is not going to happen, because on this day, those of us united here will rise up and defend this nation and its matrimonial heritage against the forces which seek to tear it down. And if we have to go down and lose on this vote and on this issue, then let’s go down together in unity and solidarity, knowing that after death comes resurrection and new life and freedom!

My Canadian brothers and sisters, in the Christian Scriptures, there is an event which Christians refer to as Pentecost. The followers of Jesus are in the upper room. They are afraid. They are timid. And they are somewhat divided. Suddenly a gust of wind descends upon them and they are emboldened to proclaim their Gospel. Ladies and gentlemen, this day in our nation’s history is our Canadian Pentecost. The Gospel is Marriage. And all of us here – Muslim, Jew, Christian, Hindu, Sikh – indeed all Canadians – are the Apostles of Marriage. And now the time has come for us to stand and defend the good news of marriage as being only the union of one man and one woman.

In the words of the Pope John Paul II:  Be not afraid.

Thank you and God Bless you all.

April 9, 2005

2 thoughts on “Marriage, Freedom & The Rainbow Courts

  1. OK, I like your blog, but this was a bit sloppy. It looks like the original report suggested one gay marriage (between Canadians) in TORONTO, in FIRST HALF of 2007, not one in the whole country in the whole year. Second, the report seems to be wrong, probably due to some glitch in their database. In fairness, the no-one seems to know the actual figures at this time, but it’s probably in the hundreds.

    It’s probably true that gay marriage – as an institution rather than a political cause – is very marginal in the gay community, but you need to come up with figures that can withstand scrutiny.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Solve : *
21 × 14 =