Labour MP Says Catholics Shouldn’t Have A Political Voice

Is Labour becoming the anti-Catholic party? Young Labour’s vice chairman, Conor McGinn, thinks so. He has resigned his position, offended by what he saw as the anti-Catholic attitude surrounding the recent Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill. This was most stridently articulated by the Labour MEP Mary Honeyball, who asked: “Should devout Catholics such as Ruth Kelly, Des Browne and Paul Murphy be allowed on the government front bench in the light of their predilection to favour the Pope’s word above the government’s?”…(Source)

This is a good thing.  People are starting to come out of the closet and tell us what they think of Catholics.  Good for them.  That might be just what the doctor ordered to all the sleeping Catholics who go to Church on Sunday. Keep talking Mary. Nice and loud so we can all hear you, you anti-Catholic bigot.

2 thoughts on “Labour MP Says Catholics Shouldn’t Have A Political Voice

  1. John S, I have to agree with you. I would point out, however, that Canada’s NDP Party is the ONLY political party in Canada that has aligned itself with Islamist organizations in pursuit of Islamist goals and the suppression of free speech in Canada. “Taliban Jack” – as Mr. Layton has been labelled – aligned himself with Mohammad Elmasry (who has said that it is okay to kill Israelis over the age of 18 – charming, what?).

    In the Canadian political arena, EVERY POLITICAL PARTY is essentially treasonous. The parties differ only in the DEGREE to which they are treasonous. Essentially, then, it’s not a question of WHETHER Canadians will be “sold down the river” as much as it is a question of “how fast will Canadians end up being sold down the river by their governments.”

    The wise Canadian would do well to investigate acquiring dual citizenship. For example, if you are of British descent and have parents who were born in Britain, you can acquire British citizenship quite readily. Not that Britain isn’t being sold down the river by its government, too, but is IS a member state of the EU and, as such, could serve as a springboard to whatever sane pockets Europe manages to maintain.

    The BEST option, of course, is to acquire American citizenship. That way, when Canada ceases to be a recognizable democracy (that’s about 15 to 25 years from now), one can simply take a drive “home” to “freedom” in the United States of America.

    NOTE TO SELF: In the longer term, it really pays off to have a national identity!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Solve : *
3 − 3 =