Real story here.
Aside from the media concoction and fraud in this case, the substantive issue should be addressed.
Preventing fertilization (i.e. normally associated with contraception), in my humble opinion, should not be a problem in these cases.
Provided that there can be near-certainty in ensuring that it does not cause an abortion, the medicine could be licitly dispensed.
No action can be judged apart from the context, as Catholic teaching has traditionally held. Humanae Vitae itself suggests that it may be licit, as well.
15. On the other hand, the Church does not consider at all illicit the use of those therapeutic means necessary to cure bodily diseases, even if a foreseeable impediment to procreation should result there from—provided such impediment is not directly intended for any motive whatsoever. (19)
A rape, obviously, lacks consent of one of the parties so the act itself does not pretend to be something it’s not.
A couple who engages in sexual relations with consent and also uses contraception speaks a lie because they are intending something which is not true: we may have gratification without being open to procreation.
On the other hand, there is no such dialogue in the case of a rape. The rape victim does not seek to manipulate the sexual act, any more than the woman who takes contraceptive hormonal pills to fight some other disorder does.
Of course, I am very open to being corrected on this point. Just throwing out my “Joe Six Pack” opinion.