Canadian Bishops Split on Charity Money

Church Funds went to Abortion Supporters

 An apparent split has developed among Canadian Catholic bishops over the Canadian Church’s overseas development arm “Development and Peace.” D&P is the Canadian version of the US bishops’ Catholic Relief Services.

On March 12, 2009, the online newspaper LifeSiteNews ran the first of a series of stories which included documentary evidence showing D&P’s funding of organizations supporting abortion and contraception. On April 17, LifeSite detailed D&P funding extending to at least 17 organizations in 10 countries: Benin, Brazil, East Timor, Guinea, Haiti, Mexico, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Peru, and Togo. The article named each organization and specified their activities. The series produced a negative response from some Canadian bishops. In a March 23 letter, James Weisgerber, archbishop of Winnipeg and the current president of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, said that the accusations against D&P were “untrue.” Also on March 23, Archbishop Daniel Bohan of Regina, called the reports both “false” and “malicious.” But the evidence LifeSite compiled was compelling enough to provoke an extraordinary May 28, 2009 letter from the bishops of Peru to the Canadian bishops, formally requesting the Canadian bishops to cease funding groups in Peru which support contraception/abortion:

 

“Each (funded) group either explicitly endorses abortion, and/or contraception, either by name or by its various euphemisms like ‘sexual and reproductive rights’ or some derivation thereof,” wrote the Peruvian bishops. “In that sense, we respectfully would like to formally request that the funding for the pro-abortion groups in Peru by the Canadian Catholic Organization for Development and Peace be halted.”

The Peruvian bishops also wrote: “It is very disturbing to have groups which work against the bishops of Peru by attempting to undermine legal protection for the right to life of unborn children, be funded by our brother bishops in Canada.”

On June 18, Archbishop Martin William Currie of St. Johns, and Bishop Francois Lapierre of Saint-Hyacinth, writing for the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, responded to LifeSite’s 60-story series with a two and one-half page report. The short report, which was “assisted” by D&P officials, referred to “allegations” by LifeSite, ignoring the fact that the LSN articles were not “allegations” but presented documentary evidence that the funding of the organizations had occurred. The bishops’ report did not mention the letter from the Peruvian bishops. Further, the bishops’ report only examined the instances where D&P had funded organizations that support abortion/contraception in Mexico. It ignored the other 9 countries involved. However, the report did criticize LifeSite:

“We make an urgent appeal to the leadership of Lifesite News that it establish an open and fruitful dialogue with Canadian Catholic groups. We are convinced that when a group makes allegations, accusations and denunciations against another, this can bring nothing positive to our Church and is a counter-witness to that Gospel spirit.”

But the LifeSite series does appear to be bearing fruit. On March 17, Archbishop Thomas Collins of Toronto, the largest archdiocese in Canada, issued a statement calling for an investigation of D&P: “Development & Peace has not as yet received its funding from ShareLife for 2009. Be assured I will not allow any money raised in the archdiocese of Toronto to be used for pro-abortion activities or organizations.”

On March 25, Bishop Nicola De Angelis of the diocese of Peterborough, joined Archbishop Collins: “On the example of other dioceses, we have contacted Development & Peace to express our deep concerns and have asked that they address this extremely serious matter immediately.” His Excellency also said: “Be assured I will not allow any money raised in the Diocese of Peterborough to be used for pro-abortion activities or organizations.” Other Canadian bishops have echoed this position.

Since these statements were made nearly two months before the bishops’ report was issued, the report itself seems somewhat behind the curve. On July 22, Archbishop Collins followed up. He said that all funds from the Archdiocese of Toronto earmarked for D&P will now only be given to organizations approved by the local bishop: “We will set aside $1,125,000, which will be available for projects of Development and Peace which are operated by organizations endorsed by local bishops.” That stipulation would bring D&P in line with the US bishops’ Catholic Relief Services.

His Excellency also called for a “thorough review” of D&P. “(I)n this coming year there needs to be a comprehensive review of the organization, including its mandate, its governance and organizational structure, its policies and protocols related to the funding of projects, and the instruments of communication linking Development and Peace and the Canadian bishops…It is vital that this coming year be one in which Development and Peace experiences profound renewal, and the depth of that renewal will determine its future,” he said. “Future ShareLife funding for Development and Peace will depend upon our assessment of the degree to which the issues that concern us have been resolved.”

Some Canadian clergy are more vehement. Fr. Alphonse de Valk, editor of CatholicInsight.com said: D&P “…has always been driven by political ideology; in fact, by a political ideology of the left, even more so than by its Catholic religious motivation…let D&P rest in peace for eternity.”  (Source: California Catholic Daily)

9 thoughts on “Canadian Bishops Split on Charity Money

  1. Wow! John has a kindred spirit in California! No wait, it’s just somebody with common sense that knows how to read D&P’s annual report and it’s partners’ websites.

    I love this part:

    “the fact that the LSN articles were not “allegations” but presented documentary evidence that the funding of the organizations had occurred”

  2. Yup, it’s that blatantly obvious. Sadly. Yet the CCCB refuses to see.

    Isn’t the whole point of an annual report to provide accountability on how an organization has spent it’s money? Yet if the organization denies the very facts they published in their own annual report, what’s the point? Even secular corporations provide more accountability to their shareholders.

    What a joke.

  3. August 5, 2009.
    Please note the article below was written in November 2003 by me. I feel it is pertinent to re-issue it as Lifesite News has done an excellent job recently regarding the controversy regarding Development and Peace. Stephen J. Gray

    The Undermining of Faith and Morals From Within The Catholic Church

    By Stephen J Gray

    “One of the most ominous symptoms of decay in the Church today is the increasing acceptance of modern amoralism”
    Dietrich von Hildebrand, writing in his book: “Trojan Horse In The City Of God.”

    For years people in the Catholic church have been writing letters and protesting abortion and homosexuality only to see their efforts undermined by other Catholics within the church. Some Catholics have even been persecuted and criticized by trade unions and special interest groups for standing up for their Catholic faith. The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops(CCCB) worked with some of these groups and unions. More on this later in the article.

    The Canadian Catholic Organization for Development and Peace (CCODP) sometimes called Development and Peace solicits funds from the Catholic faithful and some of this money has been handed over to other organizations. One wonders how those unsuspecting Catholics feel about some of their “Share Lent” money being shared with radical groups.

    Catholic Insight magazine, June 2001 issue, page 26, stated the following regarding CCODP: “On the heels of the revelation of its $135,000 donation to the World March of Women-2000 event last year, comes the news of a Catholic Development and Peace donation of $140,000 to the Peoples Summit of the Americas held in Quebec City….” One wonders if there are other groups out there who have received money from Development and Peace. Perhaps it’s time this organization has had to detail where all its money has gone over the last number of years.

    Regarding The World March of Women: Catholic Insight, June 2000 issue had this to say: “…the Canadian organizers were the usual proponents of abortion, lesbianism and other feminist demands…” The National Post of May 15, 2000, stated: ” The Canadian Womens March Committee…includes abortion activist groups such as the Canadian Abortion Rights Action League.” The Interim newspaper May 2000 issue had the headline on page 2: “March coordinator says pro-life groups not welcome.”

    The Catholic Womens League (CWL) which is supposed to uphold the teachings of the church made a submission to a government committee on so-called “same sex marriage” that undermines Catholic teaching. Life site news of April 16, 2003, stated that: “CWL National President Marie Cameron, who in her own presentation before the committee demanded the legal recognition of homosexual civil unions.” Still the leadership of the CWL is no stranger to controversy. B.C. Report magazine of Aug. 26, 1996 had an article headlined, “No friend of Catholicism.” The subject of the article was Hedy Fry who was “the federal minister responsible for the status of women” at the time and had been invited by the “CWL’s national executive” to address their convention.

    The article went on to say: “Dr. Fry,… is a noted champion of pro-abortion and homosexual-rights policies, both of which explicitly contradict basic church doctrine.”
    Ms. Fry is also a supporter of same sex marriage and was on the committee hearing submissions on this insane proposal. One wonders if there is a virus out there eating brain cells. Why else would supposedly intelligent politicians be discussing such nonsense?!

    In the annual report of the Canadian Advisory Council on the Status of Women (CACSW), (1989-1990), its new president Glenda Sims had this to say: “the federal government, among others, has acknowledged that sexual orientation should be read into the general open-ended language of section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms…” and of course a judge did “read in” this a few years later. One is reminded of that old saying: Oh, what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive.

    Didn’t the politicians blame the judges for “reading in” sexual orientation? Yet Ms. Sims tells us “the federal government… acknowledged” it should be read in. Obviously there was discussion around this and it eventually came to fruition in the courts. This report goes on to say: “abortion is a health issue.” One wonders when people began thinking pregnancy was a disease? A CWL member is listed as belonging and being a council member in this CACSW annual report.

    Less anyone thinks this undermining of Catholic teaching is a recent phenomenon it is worth checking out the book ” Behind The Mitre” by Tony Clarke. Mr. Clarke was “social policy adviser for the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops [CCCB] for 21 years.” He was eventually dismissed.

    We are told in his book page 101, how a “Social Solidarity project” was formed and “endorsed in principle… by the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, the Canadian Labour Congress, the Confederation of Canadian Unions,… the National Action Committee on the Status of Women,…” and others. Which raises the question, why would the CCCB be endorsing or working with pro-abortion organizations like the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) or the National Action Committee on the Status of Women (NAC)?

    The B.C. Catholic of Dec. 15, 1996 had the headline, “CCCB secretary defends NAC donation.” The article says, “The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops gladly donated $2000…” to NAC for a “March against Poverty.” Interestingly enough this march was also “co-sponsored by the Canadian Labour Congress.” Trade unions have been financial supporters of NAC and many other groups over the years with their memberships compulsory union dues. In fact, the National Post of June 7, 1999, stated: “NAC expects to receive $741,692 in revenue next year, of which $642,892 is in the form of government and labour union grants as well as from direct mail campaigns…”

    I headed an organization called Save the Union Movement and published a newsletter for 11 years, exposing the misuse of trade union time and money. The connections between the CCCB, trade unions and special interest groups a few years ago was quite common according to Mr. Clarke in his book “Behind The Mitre.” In fact, the CCCB put out a pamphlet called “Supporting Labour Unions.” On Feb. 22, 1994, I wrote the CCCB (at the time their Chairman was Bishop Faber MacDonald). I explained how trade unions were funding abortion clinics, homosexuality and other special interest groups and asked the CCCB to put out a pastoral letter informing Catholic union members about the misuse of their union dues. The CCCB would not do it, even though some Catholic union members had been persecuted for standing up for their faith and for speaking out against union support of abortion and homosexuality. Some had even spent their own money fighting the unions on these issues.

    I had also written the CCCB as far back as 1992 when Archbishop Gervais was President, and was told: “The issue you raise is, of course, of great importance to Canadian society, and it will be given attention.” The letter was signed by Msgr. James Weisgerber, General Secretary. I am still waiting for this “attention” from the CCCB.

    I had also written Bishop Remi De Roo, and in a letter dated Jan.7, 1992, from his executive assistant these words were written: “Bishop Remi De Roo has asked me to acknowledge receipt of your Dec. 30th letter.” 1992 was the year Bishop De Roo was addressing his union and special interest friends in Action Canada Network (see his quote later on in this article). Perhaps asking him to speak out was to near the mark as he was involved with these groups I was exposing.

    I had also written Archbishop Ambrozic of Toronto, who wrote me on Sept. 16, 1992, and said: “I received the information you had sent me and apologize for my failure to acknowledge it. One reason for this failure is my inability to see clearly what can be done about it all and whether your prescription is the correct way to go about it.”

    I had also had a meeting in 1992 with Archbishop Exner of Vancouver and informed him about the trade unions involvement in abortion and homosexuality; I also had correspondence with him over a period of time. In one of my letters I informed Archbishop Exner that the B.C Federation of Labour had said that, “Public funds should not be used to finance private education or private institutions.” Archbishop Exner in a letter to me of Nov. 14, 1992 said he “raised the concerns of the Save the Union Movement at the most recent Ecumenical Bishops meeting on October 19, 1992.” The Archbishop wrote me on October 30,1993, and referred me to a Mr. Farrell who was Executive Director of Catholic Charities Central Office. I did meet with Mr. Farrell on Dec. 1, 1993. On Feb. 21, 1994, I had a phone call from Mr. Farrell saying that Archbishop Exner had written Archbishop Faber MacDonald of the CCCB with the concerns I had raised. All that was ever asked of all these Bishops was a pastoral letter informing Catholic union members of the misuse of their union dues or to speak out. Yet none of these Bishops would do it. Yet as I mentioned earlier, the CCCB has no problem putting out a pamphlet in support of unions but would not speak out when these same unions were involved in immoral activities. One wonders why? If the Bishops had had the courage to speak out and taken action and mobilized the Catholic faithful in 1992, would we have had the problems that we have today…. problems such as unions like the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) interfering in Catholic education with the Marc Hall case, and unions objecting to a Catholicity clause at a Catholic school in B.C.

    We can also see the undermining of Catholic beliefs in the affiliation of the Ontario English Catholic Teachers Association (OECTA) with the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC). (The affiliation was reported in the communist newspaper The Peoples Voice April 1996 issue.) In fact the present Boss of the CLC, Ken Georgetti, sent out a letter soliciting funds for abortion clinics when he was president of the B.C. Federation of Labour (BCFL). He stated in this letter that “in a short time, funds have been raised to pay the down payment on the $237,000 medical clinic.” He goes on to say: “the Executive Council urges all affiliates to send donations, consider loans or monthly pledges.” The B.C. Coalition for Abortion Clinics stated in a brochure that ” the B.C. Federation of Labour and the Canadian Labour Congress, along with other labour organizations have long supported womens right to choice on abortion, free standing abortion clinics and medicare coverage for abortion.” The Ontario Coalition for Abortion Clinics (OCAC) has also received money from trade unions. It is stated in the book, Social Movements, Social Change, The Politics and Practice of Organizing that “at various labour conventions in 1982 and 1983, OCAC activists were involved in garnering support for choice.” This book also states that “many unions have contributed financial and material support to OCAC.” Abortionist Henry Morgentaler, that great supporter of “freedom of choice” has also had his share of compulsory union dues. The book, The Charter of Rights and the Legalization of Politics in Canada, page 301, states that “… the Ontario Federation of Labour has donated thousands of dollars to the Morgentaler defence…” OECTA is also a member of the Ontario Federation of Labour. This makes catholic union members brothers and sisters in solidarity with abortionists, and of course their affiliation fees will help pay for the special interest groups funded by the CLC.

    The radical feminists also boast about the power they have in trade unions. The book, Union Sisters states: “We have pushed unions to be more responsive to the needs and concerns of women; to fight on issues they have traditionally shied away from – issues like…support of lesbian and gay rights and abortion…”

    B.C. Report magazine of April 10, 2000, page18, gives an example of these radical feminists in action. A group called “Collectif Autnome Feministe” were protesting in front of Cathedral of Mary Queen of the World in Montreal. They were protesting, “about the church’s anti-abortion , anti-sex-education, anti-homosexuality tendencies.” The article goes on to say a number of people “entered the church. They spray painted Religion a trap for fools on the facade and No Gods, no masters on the altar itself. Condoms and underwear were strewn everywhere….Soiled tampons were stuck to paintings. The missal and two altar cloths were taken; hundreds of hymn books were shredded.” The article also states, “The police will not say whether the vandalism within the church was connected to the protest by the Collectif…”

    There is an old hymn called “Onward Christian soldiers marching off to war”: make no mistake, war is being waged in Canada today on Catholics and other Christians. Our schools, our beliefs, our churches are under attack and many of our Catholic and Christian leaders have fled the battlefield. This war is financed by our own tax dollars, our own compulsory union dues, some of our own church donations and some of our leaders are co-operating with the enemy. The weapons being used are the courts, so called human rights commissions, trade union bureaucracies controlled by special interests, and political parties with no principles.

    One party, the NDP, has been the recipient of millions of dollars over the years in compulsory union dues; this is the socialists captive financial support base in this war. This is also the party that helped start the war on traditional family life. It led the charge for abortion and homosexuality and has been joined by most of the other political parties.

    According to Statistics Canada, 1991 census, over 80% of the people in Canada claim Christian affiliation. If this is true, the time has come to get out of our pews and into our marching shoes. Nobody attacks our Jewish brethren with impunity. Why should we surrender to this virulent minority who are attacking all that we hold dear? Though it would appear some are not prepared to fight.

    In fact, in a letter dated April 7, 1994 to Archbishop Exner of Vancouver, Bishop MacDonald stated, “Organizations like the Save the Union Movement May Well play into the Hands of Forces in Society that Favour Laissez-Faire Capitalism.” He also says in this letter, “It needs to be stressed that every union measure supporting abortion or other activities offensive to Catholics was the result of a democratic vote of the membership.” (the underlining was in the quote.) He goes on to say that Save the Union Movement “would in fact end up assisting the enemies of free trade unionism.” Union dues are compulsory, as is membership, so “free trade unionism” is a misnomer. Also how can you have compulsory democracy? Bishop MacDonald also stated in his letter, “When this whole issue came up in 1985, the Social Affairs Commission of the Ontario Bishops debated it. At that time, the labour union advisers to the Commission advised against a frontal attack on the offensive resolutions…” The Bishops are supposed to be teachers of faith and morals yet they defer to “labour union advisers.” All that was ever asked of the CCCB was to write a pastoral letter about unions supporting abortion and homosexuality. The question needs to be asked of the CCCB: just who is playing into “the hands of forces in society” by not speaking out when members of the Catholic faith are attacked for living up to their faith? Was it because the CCCB had already been a part of these union and special interest group projects? Were they already compromised and perhaps were now afraid to criticize trade unions and some of these special interest groups? Which makes one wonder, does solidarity come before morality?

    Perhaps some in these coalitions would also point out the role of the CCCB in their “Social Solidarity project.” For as Mr. Clarke writes on page 102, of “Behind The Mitre,” “the Social Solidarity project provided a unique opportunity to forge links between progressive social movements in Quebec and the rest of Canada.” The quote below by Bishop Remi De Roo shows that he was in favour of “developing alliances.”

    ” it is only by developing alliances between peoples organizations and building a broad based social movement in this country that we have any chance of effectively replacing the corporate agenda with our own dynamic peoples agenda.”
    Bishop Remi De Roo quoted in Accent magazine March 1992. PEI, Union of Public Sector Employees.
    Note: The bishop was speaking at an event sponsored by Action Canada Network (ACN) and the Canadian Labour Congress. ACN was a coalition of unions and special interest groups headed up by Tony Clarke. Mr. Clarke was chair of the ACN while he was still working for the CCCB. Many of these groups were pro-abortion and supporters of the lesbian and homosexual lifestyle.

    Mr. Clarke states in the preface of his book: “As co-director of the social affairs department of the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops from the late seventies to the early nineties, I was responsible for working with a team of bishops and staff in developing a plan of action for taking moral leadership [emphasis added] on national economic and social policy issues.” Oh really? One would have thought only the Bishops would be in charge of “moral leadership.” Instead Catholics had 21 years of Mr. Clarke helping with “moral leadership.”
    Mr. Clarke goes on to write in his book on page 102: “the Social Solidarity project helped to lay the groundwork for the building of a broad-based social movement…” The World March of Women consisted of some of these so-called “broad based social movements” including NAC and the CLC; this twosome pops up all the time. The March was also supported by the CWL. This was done by the CWL “without consulting its members.”(Catholic Insight, page 7, June 2000 issue.) And of course the CWL never consulted its members when it made its submission to the committee on so called, “same sex marriage” but “demanded the legal recognition of homosexual civil unions” as stated earlier in this article.

    Mr. Clarke has this to say on page 194 of his book regarding a “prophetic alliance,” “the active participation of Development and Peace would be essential, not only because it has a relatively strong network of Catholic activists and significant resources for campaign activities, but for the key role it could play in forging active links with partners in Central and Latin America.” Development and Peace obviously has “significant resources” when as mentioned earlier they contributed $135,000 and $140,000 to the World March of Women and The Peoples Summit of the Americas respectively. In fact Development and Peace had a Total Revenue of $23,870,755 for 2001-2002; this information comes from their own publication.

    Mr. Clarke is now director of an organization called the Polaris Institute and his organization is a participating member of the Solidarity Network (www.solidaritynetwork.ca) as is Development and Peace. Other notable member organizations are: Canadian Religious Conference, National Action Committee on the Status of Women (NAC) and the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) – it seems you can’t have one without the other- a whole bunch of unions and other special interest groups, some of whom also receive government grants. It reads like a “whose-who” of the social and political left. Many of the groups listed are the same ones that were members of the ACN of which Mr. Clarke was chair.

    The website states, “Our National Solidarity Assemblies and workshops bring together equality-seeking groups including public and private sector unions and Aboriginal/First Nations, anti-poverty, anti-racist, cultural, environmental, faith, farming, health, immigrant and refugee, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, peace, seniors and pensioners, students, women, and youth organizations.” I wonder how many people out there know they are being counted as members. The website also states: “organizations are asked to commit monthly or annual financial contributions to the Solidarity Network…” Which raises the question: how much money, if any, has Development and Peace given to this Solidarity Network? Does the CCCB know, and does it condone Development and Peace associating and working with pro-abortion and pro-homosexual organizations?

    “For thirty years pro-life activists have battled one government after another while a politically – correct Bishops Conference remained silent. As for individual bishops, with very few exceptions they haven’t so much as dared question, let alone oppose, pro-abortion or pro-sodomite Catholic politicians and deny them Catholic institutional support.”
    -Father Alphonse de Valk, writing in Catholic Insight magazine November 2000.

    To the above quote by Father de Valk I would add trade unions and their special interest group allies. The Bishops haven’t dared question or oppose them either. In fact the CCCB gave them “institutional support.” Could this be a case of “Solidarity Forever?” An editorial in Catholic New Times of October 5, 2003. had this to say about the CCCB statement on marriage: “The bishops’ statement does not repeat Vatican language like ‘homosexual practices are sins gravely contrary to chastity,'” the editorial goes on to say about homosexual relationships; ‘Might this not be a road to holiness?’ We have now reached a critical stage in this country where religious people are under constant attack and their beliefs trashed from within and without. The undermining of society and the anti-social agenda has also been achieved in big part by trade unions using compulsory union dues and special interest groups using our tax dollars; some of these groups also receive union funding. Their networks are extensive and their connections are interwoven.

    Catholic politicians and other politicians seem to be afraid to stand up for what is right and put an end to this perversion of the system. Though there are a few exceptions among the politicians.

    The question has to be asked: were some of our religious leaders and their organizations duped into consorting with some of these groups, giving some of them money and giving them legitimacy by taking part in their “Social Solidarity project”? Or were they in fact, in Lenin’s words, “useful idiots.” Meanwhile, people who stood up for their faith got very little support, if any, from the CCCB and were hung out to dry as the saying goes. I myself spent 11 years and thousands of dollars of my own money fighting and exposing these injustices. Then I realized it was futile to ask the CCCB to take a stand for they were part of the problem. Answers are needed and perhaps even an inquiry on this undermining of faith and morals in the Catholic Church in Canada.

    Stephen J. Gray
    Nov. 15, 2003.
    graysinfo@gmail.com website http://graysinfo.blogspot.com
    Some Info on the Author: Stephen Gray is a writer and researcher on various topics. He published a newsletter for 11 years exposing the misuse of trade union time and money.


    Check out my blog: http://graysinfo.blogspot.com

  4. August 5, 2009.
    Please note the article below was written in November 2003 by me. I feel it is pertinent to re-issue it as Lifesite News has done an excellent job recently regarding the controversy regarding Development and Peace. Stephen J. Gray

    The Undermining of Faith and Morals From Within The Catholic Church

    By Stephen J Gray

    “One of the most ominous symptoms of decay in the Church today is the increasing acceptance of modern amoralism”
    Dietrich von Hildebrand, writing in his book: “Trojan Horse In The City Of God.”

    For years people in the Catholic church have been writing letters and protesting abortion and homosexuality only to see their efforts undermined by other Catholics within the church. Some Catholics have even been persecuted and criticized by trade unions and special interest groups for standing up for their Catholic faith. The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops(CCCB) worked with some of these groups and unions. More on this later in the article.

    The Canadian Catholic Organization for Development and Peace (CCODP) sometimes called Development and Peace solicits funds from the Catholic faithful and some of this money has been handed over to other organizations. One wonders how those unsuspecting Catholics feel about some of their “Share Lent” money being shared with radical groups….
    Read more at graysinfo.blogspot.com

  5. Hi John, is it time yet to speak with our wallets by withholding our Sunday offering and giving it elsewhere? It seems to me that $$$ is the best way for the faithful to speak.

    I’d love to hear what others think.

    Keep up the great work John.
    God Bless.

  6. I can certainly attest to the accuracy of the above article and appreciate the summary by Steve Gray.

    It seemed, back in the early years, that we were working as individuals and not aware of other like-minded people.

    Tony Clark was most dangerous to the Catholic Church and our Bishops listened to him! I think it could be said that it was Liberation Theology that was being promoted and so difficult to correct.

    Another organization that needs to be tackled is the “Catholic” Health Association.

    Thanks, however, for all the good people that have the talent to lay all these facts out for us.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Solve : *
26 ⁄ 13 =