Break the Media Blackout on Gosnell

Facebook page here.

There is a special place in Hell just for secular journalists. In fact, at times, I think Hell was created just for them.

 

The Blogosphere and Tweet-o-sphere is having an affect:

1.) CNN PRIOR TO TODAY – 0 COVERAGE * TODAY – 2 MAJOR STORIES
2.) WASHINGTON POST – 0 COVERAGE TODAY STATED: “WE SHOULD HAVE SENT A REPORTER THERE EARLIER.”
3.) FOX NEWS PRIOR TO TODAY – 10 STORIES IN 2 WEEKS * TODAY – 8 STORIES

 

4 thoughts on “Break the Media Blackout on Gosnell

  1. Nice try. What he is OFFICIALLY accused of is what can be proven in a court of law. The truth is obviously a much higher number, considering his very long and “industrious” career in the “industry”: While he’s only charged with killing seven live babies, prosecutors believe Gosnell killed hundreds of infants and destroyed related records, according to a grand jury report.

    But I am not surprised that you would come to the rescue of a mass murderer and rush to put the best spin possible on such heinous crimes. A well-formed conscience, a modicum of reality, and an aversion to the Koolaid are not qualities that you or your pro-abort collaborators hold in particular abundance.

    And as for your reference to the Forbes article, this what the writer said:

    I would lay my finger on a cause that is at once far more banal and far more difficult to combat: the fact that almost all of our “national” media outlets are based in Washington and New York. I have no doubt whatsoever that if Kermit Gosnell had been mutilating women and murdering babies in The Bronx or in Southeast DC, rather than in West Philadelphia, that it would immediately have become a national story.

    That’s it? That’s the explanation? Because it’s in the “backwater” of Philadelphia and those poor reporters from New York and Washington couldn’t get through those rural roads to the hicksville of Philadelphia to cover the trial? Hahahaha! The idiocy of the pro-abort media and its defenders know no bounds! They have all lost their minds.

  2. I know that you don’t really care for accuracy, but please do not say that I have come to the rescue of this horrible individual.

    Most people will only take you seriously when you tell the truth. Isn’t telling the truth one of the tenets of your religion? Or are you flexible on that too?

    • I know that you don’t really care for accuracy

      Liar. Socon or Bust cares very much about accuracy. In 7 years on the internet, rarely have we been wrong, and if we’ve misstated something, we quickly corrected it and apologized if necessary.

      but please do not say that I have come to the rescue of this horrible individual.

      Why not? You sure seem to come running, demanding some bogus “accuracy” check and accusing me of inaccuracy. What’s the moral difference between Gosnell and the great majority of abortionists and abortion clinics which are scarely better than his? You’ve got some contortions to go through, dear.

      Most people will only take you seriously when you tell the truth.

      People who respect the truth take me seriously. That’s why I am not really that concerned what you think of me, to be honest.

      Isn’t telling the truth one of the tenets of your religion? Or are you flexible on that too?

      Are you for real? Best stop before you go on. If I have not told the truth, point it out. Otherwise, best to keep quiet.

      Gosnell most likely murdered hundreds from the finding of the Grand Jury in his case. He was accused of that. That’s a fact. We’ll never know because your abortionist-hero destroyed evidence. Why would he do that? To preserve a “woman’s right to choose” and his pocket book, no doubt.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Solve : *
5 × 29 =