Another Abortion Nightmare

Pro-aborts read. Nod. Eyes Glaze Over. Ask, “What’s the problem?  She’s gotta die so I may have my freedom of choice.”

Abortion: what a great invention for selfish men. 

“Honey, you’re going to the abortion clinic tonight and you’ll like it, dammit.  If you don’t, I’ll kick you in the stomach and kill that clump of cells.”

No law against coercion. No law against harming an unborn child.

Abortion: what a great invention for selfish men.

27 thoughts on “Another Abortion Nightmare

  1. What a brilliant post, then why are …
    (I’m sorry, the grammar is so poor, I can’t even mock it effectively)

    Must have been trained in a atheist public school.

  2. Coercion? Are you serious? Nice post, way to spin the story inside the bubble you socons live in – real classy to twist the facts from tragedies such as this to further your “cause”. What a douchebag.

  3. Hey John you are blaspheming the religion of pro-death in Canada. You can be hauled off by our so-called Canadian justice system with their Law School interpretation of the evolving society and living tree doctrine of Canadian Law. This interpretation is nonsence and our university professors have been socially engineered to teach this. The Christian professors that don’t have tenure, and are teaching their students the truth that this evolving society and living tree interpretation of Canadian Law is nonsence get fired by our Darwinian humanist atheist university boards. In this way they have institutionalized atheism in Canada and the Church because we all go through our education establishments. This is why so many so-called Christians have compartmentalized their lives. When they compartmentalize their christianity they become pseudo-christians. This is a tragedy and this is diabolical.

  4. I see you are attracting the cream of the crop today John.

    The word “douchebag” is on the grade 12 spelling test in the public schools I believe. If the student spells it within Liberal mandated tolerances, a certificat of indoctrination is assured.

    I am sorry, but the posters atrocious grammar once again precludes me from exercising my wit on own words.

    I was initailly tempted to refer to “AB Report” as a “scumbag” but I fear that bags containing scum may submit a hate crime complaint with the Human Rights Commission.

  5. I apologize for the spelling errors in my previous post. My fingers are protesting that they each have the individual right to hit the keys when THEY want to. They seem to be rebelling against the oppression of the hands.

  6. The morality of our country is best judged by how we treat our own children. Sadly, millions of pregnancies have ended in abortion, one of the most dangerous places to be in Canada is in the womb. Taking the life of an innocent human being, is morally wrong.

    By abortion, the mother does not learn to love, but kills even her own baby to solve her problems. And by abortion, the father is told that he does not have to take any responsibility at all for the child he has brought into the world. That father is likely to put other women into the same trouble. So abortion just leads to more abortion.

    Any country that accepts abortion is not teaching its people to love, but to use any violence to get what they want.

  7. Modern Science Proves That Abortion Kills Innocent Human Life

    Former abortionist Dr. Bernard Nathanson says that real-time Ultrasound, which gives a moving picture of the child in the womb; Electronic Heart Monitoring, which detects fetal heartbeats, Brainwave Monitors, which measure brain activity, Fetoscopy, which allows a physician to actually eyeball the baby, simply astounded him. Such techniques as Cordocentesis even allow medical diagnosis, treatment and surgery in utero.” I finally came to the conviction that this was my patient. This was a person ! This was a change of mind as a result of Fantastic Technology.”

    Dr. Nathanson fastened an Ultrasound Machine to a woman undergoing an abortion, and produced ” SILENT SCREAM”, the film horrified the nation. It showed the fetus trying desperately to move away from the vacuum, and then its body parts were successively sucked off. The film produced a massive campaign of defamation agaist Dr. Bernard Nathanson from the liberal-minded.

    This only made him more determined, so he decided to show an abortion from inside the womb. He attached a camera to a Fetoscope and inserted it during a D&E abortion. The resulting film was “ECLIPSE OF REASON”.

    Abortion is the murder of babies ! When will this Holocaust end in Canada ?

  8. She could have died in childbirth, you hideous monster.

    Nice disrespect for a woman who has died and for the family who now grieves her loss.

    How very fucking “pro life.”

  9. Wow, heck of a comeback jacksh*t, I’ve well and truly been put in my place by a class act RC apologist and so-con bubblehead. Being so vastly morally and intellectually superior, I suppose I should just run off to my spelling and/or grammar test now. I also find it very amusing that the douchebags that are supporting this moron are all MEN – surprise, surprise. I truly am a scumbag for expecting proper decorum in discourse, even though I completely loathe your ilk. Nothing says “morality” like dragging a dead woman and her family through the dirt, with lies, for your own benefit. Your sky god I’m sure is very proud of you.

    It really takes a classless prick to so eloquently imply their own crude imaginations upon those involved in such a tragedy to further their own little agendas. Fanboys of this behaviour like jacksh*t should clue everyone into the mental midgets that still exist out there – especially those that can only have a comeback that includes something about spelling or grammar? Are you serious? Must be on dialup still.

    Let me know when a loved one dies in a horrific traffic accident so I can come back and post about them in tasteless detail – just so I can return the favour you’ve provided to the people in this news story.

  10. SoCons will kill us: Your mother could have died in childbirth too. So could mine, or my wife, or any other mother. What does that have to do with any of this?

    AB Report: You flatterer. I am embarrased by such high praise. I see your grammar has improved, however you should reduce your reliance on profanity. It detracts from your credibility.

  11. My goodness. Such venom and violence from the pro-abort side. I see my observation of diabolical possession was well founded.

    Pro-aborts will never admit that abortion is rarely chosen in a truly “free” environment. There’s always pressure by someone or something – usually by the boyfriend. Few feminists want to admit that abortion is merely a tool used by men to blackmail women into getting what they want. “You’d better get rid of it or I’m leaving,” is a more common response than not, I should think. What kind of “liberation” is that? Liberation from what precisely? Your own femininity? And the child that you know is growing within you?

    I also think this description was pretty tragic:

    “She was scared and I tried to reassure her. It was a very emotional experience for us both to witness her pass her baby and my grandchild into the bedpan,” she said.

    They can’t even coverup the truth of what happened: “Baby”, “Grandchild”. What’s left to be said?

  12. You’re right. I repent. It is a baby. How could I have been such a cold and unloving fool?

    To think of all those unborn babies that have died because I would not speak up for them.

    I am truly ashamed. Thank you for having the courage and patience for standing up for the unborn.

  13. The life side wants to promote their values of life and love to Canadian culture.

    The only values the liberal minded death side imposes on the baby come in the form of a knife, a vacuum or scalding chemicals.

    The values of death and violence to get what they want are thus promoted and imposed on Canadian society.

    The liberal media ought to go into the Abortion Clinics and show the people of Canada the pictures of the piles of dead little bodies.

    Why do you suppose they Don’t ?

  14. People believe what they are “educated” to believe or what they want to believe, sometimes without good reason. An indicator of the fairness of their point of view is how they respond to even-handed fair criticism of their view when it is taken away by evidence. Do they still stand on their viewpoint, or are they willing to adjust their view based on the evidence ?

  15. Evidence? Like evidence of violence, coercion, abuse, ignorance, innocence, lack of economic sustenance, timing, etc…? Women have a right to choose. Your second to last post seems to indicate that you do not even regard women as persons. Do you? Do you understand what even brings women to make these decisions?

    The young girl in the article died from lack of proper medical attention. This would happen even more with backroom abortions.

  16. Don’t talk to me about regarding women as persons. I am defending true femininity and true womanhood. I am speaking out against the ultimate exploitation of women. You, on the other hand, are blinded by your false idea of “choice” and “freedom” that you cannot see what an unborn child is, or even have the decency to allow her to live.

    No child should have to bite off its tongue because of the excrucitating pain she suffers or desperately try to avoid the abortionist’s knife as it slices off body parts. You and those murderous abortion thugs are responsible for this and you have have the audacity to question my respect for women?

    I am married and have four daughters. I have more respect for women than you will ever have.

  17. Well, I’m glad you take the high road. If you ever find yourself on the low road, come look for me. I’ll be the one that was repeatedly violated and did not want to proceed with the fruits of some rapist’s labour. That won’t be my labour. And how do you know whether feotuses feel pain? And you’re a man? How can you speak outside of your experience as a man? You don’t have the capacity to birth or give birth. All you do is release sperm, and as any woman hopes… Hope to God that you’ll stick around for the rest without being too much of a vitriolic dirge. If you’re a good man, good for you.

    Contemporary society should be mindful of choice. NOT choice based on a Patriarchal assessment of what choice should be.

  18. Well, I’m glad you take the high road. If you ever find yourself on the low road, come look for me.

    Well, at least you’re honest on that score. Being pro-abortion is definitely the low road, gutter in fact.

    I’ll be the one that was repeatedly violated and did not want to proceed with the fruits of some rapist’s labour. That won’t be my labour.

    Are you saying this for yourself or just using rape as an excuse for abortion? A rape does not change the humanity of the unborn child and the abortion certainly does not help the mother. It’s a tragic situation, but abortion is not the solution.

    And how do you know whether feotuses feel pain?

    I will assume you are being purposely obtuse. I simply refuse to believe you don’t know. Even if you did know, I have a hard time believing it would matter much. Pro-aborts don’t generally care about how unborn children scream out in pain. It’s part of what makes them cold and heartless.

    And you’re a man? How can you speak outside of your experience as a man? You don’t have the capacity to birth or give birth. All you do is release sperm, and as any woman hopes…

    You need a lesson in remedial logic. I do not have to personally experience abortion to know that it is wrong any more than I need to experience getting shot in the head is wrong.

    Hope to God that you’ll stick around for the rest without being too much of a vitriolic dirge. If you’re a good man, good for you.

    I’m a father of four girls. All of my children were conceived in love. But even if they were not conceived in love, it does not change the humanity of the unborn child. A civilized society does not dismember innocent unborn children because her parents made a mistake.

    Contemporary society should be mindful of choice. NOT choice based on a Patriarchal assessment of what choice should be.

    Don’t be ridiculous. You pro-aborts spout off about “choice” like it’s some absolute principal that can never be subject to any kind of moral code. Choice to do WHAT precisely? Murder a baby?

  19. I had written a small response to your comments. I don’t really like writing them twice, because you lose the feel of what you wanted to say. So, I’ll leave it at that. Although, I have much, much to say about why I feel choice is important. Actually, it’s downright necessary.

  20. Sorry, I didn’t see your post anywhere. Not intentional on my part, I assure you.

    Choice is important but it is not ABSOLUTE. You pick and choose when you think choice is important and when it is subordinate to other values.

    The difference between you and I is that I have the integrity to admit it.

  21. I see. So, as an example, if someone rapes me, which is denying me the right to consent and is also anti-humanist, I have no right to choose how best to deal with that situation?

    If someone has denied me the right to choose through lack of consent, because this person doesn’t value consent, then, there is also the matter that this criminal is denying that there is, more often than not, consequences to a person’s actions.

    Therefore, by denying the right to protect myself from a criminal act by denying my right to decide how best to deal with the consequences of that act–and allowing a person to have an abortion is one of the choices allowed–it can also be seen as criminal to deny the victim the right to choose to terminate a pregnancy because her basic human rights were not considered of value to the one committing the act. The victim does not have to suffer the consequences of this person’s act.

    Please name the other values that choice should become subordinate to. I think it has more to do with circumstance.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Solve : *
20 ⁄ 5 =