

he Catholic Apologetics section of

is dedicated
to providing our visitors with conventional Catholic Apologetics, including biblical,
theological, and historical issues surrounding the Catholic Faith. Each topic-page
is divided into sub-categories: articles, dialogues, debates, and Q&A. Visitors who
are interested in suggesting an article or asking a question are encouraged to
e-mail us their request.



Pete Vere surveys some of the excuses that followers of the SSPX use to
justify their rebellion against Rome. After years as a Traditionalist, Pete
provides us with his inside view of the machinations of the SSPX.




Despite what some Lefebvrites think, Vatican II and Ecumenism is not a
bad thing. In this article, Pete Vere explains why.

John Pacheco reviews the Church's teaching on religious liberty, and
shows, despite what some Ultra-traditionalists might think, there is no separation
between a civil right and a moral right.



Pete Vere's comprehensive account of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre's break
with Rome and the canonical implications of the split. A very enjoyable, yet
disturbing, account of the legal and political power plays between Rome and Lefebvre.



Contra the claims of some ultra-traditionalists, Pope Paul VI upheld the
Catholic teaching on the Eucharist. In this article, Pete Vere, examine's
Paul VI's Mysterium Fidei, which sought to reaffirm Catholic teaching on the Eucharist.


Shawn McElhinney and Pete Vere, JCL discuss why a traditional Catholic
is one who adheres to Catholic Tradition. They examine five criteria from
Catholic Tradition to define who are authentic Catholic Traditionalists.

Fr. Gruner has been
officially suspended by the Vatican, but it seems that he believes
that his particular suspension is unjust and refuses to submit to
his superiors. Of course, how many sad cases in the
Church's history have not hosted similar pretenses as an excuse
to disobey? Pete Vere sets the record straight, gives
everybody a reality check on this situation, and explains how
Fr. Gruner is hardly a persecuted martyr for Fatima.

Objections to the Rigorist view of the absolute and exceptionless
necessity of water baptism for salvation. Comprehensive citations of
the Councils and the Fathers.


It is a difficult path to walk: on the one part, insisting on the
Church's divine institution and the "extrinsic" necessity of belonging
to her versus rejecting the absolute intrinsic and formal necessity of
belonging to the Church on the other part. It is clear, however, that
both the indifferentist position and the rigorist position pose serious
problems from a moral and theological perpective. The former finds
its foundation in Protestantism and Modernism, while the latter attempts
to quash the former with theological extremism. Neither of them
witness to the truth.



A cogent defense of the Pauline Mass's Second Eucharist Prayer contra
Traditionalist objections about its lack of sacrificial character.




