
he Catholic Apologetics section of

is dedicated
to providing our visitors with conventional Catholic Apologetics, including biblical,
theological, and historical issues surrounding the Catholic Faith. Each topic-page
is divided into sub-categories: articles, dialogues, debates, and Q&A. Visitors who
are interested in suggesting an article or asking a question are encouraged to
e-mail us their request.




In this e-mail exchange between guest apologist Brock Restovich and
Chad (a Baptist), Chad demonstrates the hole Protestantism has dug for itself
in regards to Sacred Tradition, alternately refusing it and relying on it.





See this humdinger of a video of Gerry Matatics asking James White
the following questions: (a) "Did the people in Jesus' day practice
Sola Scriptura?" (b)"Did the Apostles practice Sola
Scriptura, Mr. White, yes or no?" Incredibly, James
White answers "no" to both questions!!!! At least he's
honest, but the question is: if the early Christians or the Apostles did
not practice Sola Scriptura, then why does Mr. White? And
more importantly, if you are a Protestant, then why do you?







Mark Bonocore puts pseudo-intellectualism to rest in this rather
long dialogue. Read why Mark Bonocore is one of the top Catholic
Apologists today.




Mark Bonocore responds to a critique from a Protestant on an
earlier paper he wrote. Focusing on the Gospel of Matthew and the
epistemological flaws of Protestantism, Mark leaves this gentleman
"holding" the bag.


Jason Engwer receives a remedial lesson in basic apologetics. Read
how Mark Bonocore completely obliterates Engwer's position on Sola Scriptura,
showing him that he has no objective standard for his interpretations of the Bible.

Mark Bonocore dialogues with a fellow Catholic over Genesis 6 and the
theological consequences of the literal interpretation of angels mating with
humans. An interesting exchange.



John engages Reformed Apologist, Tim Enloe, on the inherent flaws
of Sola Scriptura. Read how really weak the Protestant position
is, despite a very able opponent's efforts.



A rebuttal to Geisler and MacKenzie's book Roman Catholics &
Evangelicals: Agreements & Differences regarding certain false Old Testament
Canon claims.


William Webster repeats the same old and tired errors of protestations
against the truth. Read about their refutation here.

The subjective Protestant proof of inspiration of the Bible is exposed
in this short exchange.
John Pacheco and James White share their views on Sola Scriptura
and various issues surrounding Church ecclesiology. The first salvo comes
early in the exchange when James suggests that St. Jerome believed in Sola
Scriptura. After a few tit-for-tats, both participants continue a more
substantive exchange. An amusing read that will keep you hooked till the
end. Please pay particular attention to James' ultimate position in an
eternal and transcendent truth surrounding a mini-exchange (near the end of the
dialogue) on Mary's Perpetual Virginity.










