he Catholic Apologetics section of is dedicated to providing our visitors with conventional Catholic Apologetics, including biblical, theological, and historical issues surrounding the Catholic Faith. Each topic-page is divided into sub-categories: articles, dialogues, debates, and Q&A. Visitors who are interested in suggesting an article or asking a question are encouraged to e-mail us their request.
Any experienced Catholic apologists is quite familiar with "the dance". An Evangelical Protestant "Bible-alone" believer will accuse the Catholic Church of "error" – of contradicting what the Bible "clearly" teaches, and of following the "traditions of men" rather than the Scriptural Word of God. 's Mark Bonocore takes a look at the Protestant psychological raison d'etre; the nature of what a Catholic apologist is really dealing with.
Guest apologist, John Betts, dismantles William Webster's shoddy research and claims about the supposed error of the Catholic Church in canonizing the "two books of Esdras". See how John builds up the Catholic case.
Staff Apologist Mark Bonocore examines a number of propositions regarding Sola Scriptura and shows the Biblical and Patristic support for the Catholic position. Needless to say, the Protestant heresy is not reasonable.
In this article, staff Apologist, Wibisono Hartono gives a brief overview of the Holy Bible, including both the Old and New Testaments. The essay covers issues such as the differing list of inspired books among Christians and the translation and transmission of the Bible into various languages.
Which books of the Old Testament were accepted as inspired by the Christians in the first four centuries? Did they accept 39 or 46 books? This article will answer these and other similar questions.
Most of us never question why the New Testament has 27 books. Did the Christians in the first four centuries always know which books belonged in the New Testament canon? Find out in this survey of the Patristic literature on the subject. A real eye opener for Protestants!
Seventh Day Adventist Michael Scheifler of Bible Light Ministries responded to one of Wib's earlier articles on the Old Testament canon. After reading Wib's first step into the apologetic fray here at , you'll quickly understand why Mike's website is called "Bible Light".
This short piece points out a little problem in the Westminster Confession's Creed on Holy Scripture. It seems that one of its articles inadvertently supports Catholic Tradition and the Church's Magisterium while tightening the already uncomfortable noose around Sola Scriptura. A short but interesting article.